Another crucial issue in this election is the future of the British electoral system

Atrois days of the general elections Thursday, the Conservatives appeared to regain ascendancy in the polls, with 35 of the vote, against 25 to 30 for the Liberal Democrats and labour in the elbow-to-elbow, according to Ukpollingreport.co.uk. That said, for many experts, these statistics augured always of a House of Commons without party holding the majority of the 650 seats said Parliament "suspended". The pressure is so heavy on each of the parties for the last days of the campaign described as the most interesting in a generation, taking into account the uncertainty, political and institutional issues and the interests of the public, stimulated by the first televised proceedings of the history of British democracy among political leaders.

For economic operators, the crucial point of this election is whether the vote will give Britain a stable government capable of dealing with the reduction of the budget deficit, currently at more than 11, which is one of the highest in the g-20. All parties have agreed to tighten the screw, even if they gave details on barely one-fifth of the approximately 40 to 50 billion pounds of sacrifices that will be compared to the current annual budget. However, Parliament suspended, the Parties shall agree to govern or to form a coalition and the interests of the country could go behind those of the parties. Negotiations may last for weeks, point specialists, and new elections might be necessary. It is clear that the financial markets, today focused on the problems of southern Europe, will monitor the situation closely. The new Parliament is expected to meet May 18 and the speech from the Queen, a speech by general policy written by the Prime Minister, is scheduled for May 25.

Another crucial issue in this election is the future of the British electoral system. For the moment, the electorate flirted with the idea to put an end to the system of the two-party system that dominated the country's recent history. The Liberal Democrats Nick Clegg, who seized the opportunity that was given to him appearing in equal with leaders of the two parties in televised debates, have chances to play the arbitrators after May 6. It is very possible that they support the party that will be ready to reform the electoral system to make it more representative of the loss of influence of the major parties. This is the reason for which the daily newspaper "the guardian" called to vote Lib Dems this weekend, a hard blow for the Labour.

In the meantime, the last week of the campaign, which many lament that it to be focused on the superficial - performance during debates - at the expense of the real issues - deficits-, committed for the Conservatives through the provision of David Cameron, their leader, in the last debate on the economy. For Benedict Brogan, a respected tory commentator, "David Cameron is Prime Minister Friday tea time".

The Conservatives, backed by numerous media including "The Economist", which had supported the Labour in the last election, in any case accentuated their efforts in territory Labour, sign of self-confidence.

Gordon Brown gaffe

The Liberal Democrats have the voice of Nick Clegg held this weekend that the race is now played between them and the right, a way of saying that they had resumed to till privileged to represent the centre-left in the country. Their breakthrough was hampered in some polls and he is sure that they finish second. Finally, the labour party were the most concerned party with the approach of the day J. The gaffe of Gordon Brown against Gillian Duffy, a retired that he described as "bounded" while the microphone was not extinguished, accentuated the pressure against him within his camp. Tony Blair has provided support at the party that he led to power in 1997, believing that vote for Nick Clegg was not "serious."